Original Steelman
The claim is plausible because it links a clear mechanism to outcomes: providing meals to all students can reduce hunger and stabilize energy and attention during the school day, which can support attendance, behavior, and learning. Universality can also reduce stigma associated with free/reduced-price meals, increasing participation among students who need it but might otherwise opt out. On administration, universal meals can simplify operations by removing or reducing eligibility determination, application processing, verification, and fee collection, which are time-consuming and error-prone. Simplification can free staff time for educational priorities and reduce paperwork for families. Additionally, higher participation can improve economies of scale in food service, potentially improving consistency and planning. Overall, the reasoning is that universal access removes barriers (financial, social, bureaucratic) that impede both nutrition uptake and efficient program management, thereby improving student readiness to learn while lowering administrative friction.